In this article:
- How Long Do You Have to Respond to a Dispute?
- What Information Should You Include in the Representment?
It is possible for a client to challenge a credit card payment once it has been made, requesting that their credit card provider reverse a payment on their card. There are various stages to a dispute and you as the person who received the payment may be asked for details of what the payment is for and you have the option to contest a challenge.
This article covers how you can respond to credit card disputes through the Actionstep Payments Portal. You may also want to read Understanding Credit Card Disputes, Actionstep Payments Dispute Reasons, and Submitting a Dispute Response Through the Payments Portal.
Key Terms | Definition |
Cardholder | The client that is disputing a transaction |
Merchant | You, or the law firm who provided the services being disputed |
Issuing Bank | The bank that issued the card to the client (i.e. the cardholder’s bank) |
Card Brand | The card brand the client’s card is associated with (Visa, Mastercard, Amex etc.) |
Representment | The response a merchant sends to the issuing bank when a transaction is disputed |
When a dispute is initiated against a merchant, they have the opportunity to respond to the issuing bank by providing compelling evidence in their favor (representment). For Retrievals and (most) First Chargebacks, dispute responses can be submitted by the merchant directly in the Portal. The Pre-Arbitration response process varies by Card Brand, and thus, they cannot be submitted in the Portal.
How Long Do You Have to Respond to a Dispute?
The timeframe allotted for a merchant to submit a dispute response varies by a) the reason for the dispute, and b) the Card Brand. In the Portal, you will notice a Response Due Date indicating when the merchant has to respond.
If the merchant fails to respond by the due date, the dispute will automatically be considered lost and the held funds will be credited to the cardholder.
What Information Should You Include in the Representment?
Although there are no definitive guidelines for what is considered "compelling evidence," and much of this depends on the reason for the dispute, valid representment evidence falls into two categories: formal evidence and informal evidence.
Formal Evidence
This includes official documentation directly related to the transaction. Formal evidence includes, but is not limited to:
Corresponding Invoice with cardholder contact information
Engagement letters or agreements
Informal Evidence
Informal evidence is relevant documentation that is not directly related to the transaction. This includes, but is not limited to:
Logs of correspondence between the merchant and cardholder
Screenshots of the merchant’s website and/or published Terms of Service
A summary of the incident written by the law firm
Your merchant’s representment should include all formal and informal evidence supporting their side of the dispute, presented clearly and concisely for the issuing bank. Providing too little evidence will likely render the representment uncompelling, but providing too much documentation may render the representment irrelevant.
For a more comprehensive guide to dispute responses please visit the Dispute Response Best Practices & Tips for Merchants.
Was this article helpful?
That’s Great!
Thank you for your feedback
Sorry! We couldn't be helpful
Thank you for your feedback
Feedback sent
We appreciate your effort and will try to fix the article